Comments on: Code review is essential. http://squeeville.com/2008/08/15/code-review-is-essential/ Jason Collins. No redaction. Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:02:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Darren http://squeeville.com/2008/08/15/code-review-is-essential/#comment-31 Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:20:09 +0000 http://squeeville.wordpress.com/?p=22#comment-31 Here’s another one: http://www.review-board.org/ Sign up for the demo, the screenshots, etc, don’t do it justice!

]]> By: sits http://squeeville.com/2008/08/15/code-review-is-essential/#comment-30 Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:10:15 +0000 http://squeeville.wordpress.com/?p=22#comment-30 Another open-source tool you can use is Codestriker – http://codestriker.sf.net which has been around for ages. Disclaimer – I am one of the authors. It has support for Subversion and other major SCMs, as well as some bug-tracking systems. I haven’t put in support for JIRA yet, but that could be added in without too much pain.

]]> By: cranley http://squeeville.com/2008/08/15/code-review-is-essential/#comment-29 Sat, 16 Aug 2008 23:52:04 +0000 http://squeeville.wordpress.com/?p=22#comment-29 I absolutely love code reviews. I love how it gives me the opportunity to actually sit and read other people’s code and share my knowledge and insight. I’ve been able to teach the team a whole lot about Unit Testing, and it’s allowed me to really encourage some best practices.

I’m very interested in trying this. I’ve found some of the features of Crucible to be really cool (specifically the inline commenting), however I find the process too detached from the rest of our work process, and I find the UI of Crubicle to be confusing and clumsy.

I look forward to trying out rietveld.

]]>